International

Iraq: Two Decades of Abuses and Human Rights Violations


As the world marks two decades since the invasion of Iraq, it is imperative to
reflect on the profound and enduring human rights crisis that has plagued the nation.
This period, far from ushering in an era of stability and respect for fundamental
freedoms, has instead been characterized by widespread and systemic human rights
violations and a pervasive culture of impunity.

These abuses have been perpetrated by a multitude of actors, including international forces, the Iraqi government, and various affiliated militias, leaving an indelible scar on the Iraqi populace and undermining the very principles of justice and human dignity.


Abuses by US-led Coalition Forces:

The initial years following the invasion were marred by a disturbing pattern of
human rights violations committed by the US-led Coalition forces. Amnesty
International extensively documented these abuses, which included indiscriminate
attacks that resulted in significant civilian casualties [ ]. Beyond direct combat, the
Coalition engaged in practices that severely undermined international humanitarian
law and human rights principles. These included the establishment of secret detention
facilities, the clandestine transfer of detainees, and instances of enforced
disappearance [ ].


Perhaps most egregious were the credible reports of torture and other cruel, inhuman,
or degrading treatment inflicted upon detainees. Accounts from former detainees
detailed practices such as sleep deprivation, forced nudity, deprivation of adequate
food and water, mock executions, and threats of rape [ ]. The infamous Abu Ghraib
prison became a symbol of these abuses, exposing a dark chapter in the occupation.
Despite the gravity of these allegations and even public admissions of involvement in
secret detentions by senior US officials, accountability for these crimes has remained
largely elusive. While some low-ranking US soldiers were court-martialed, no senior US
administration officials have been brought to justice for crimes perpetrated in Iraq
since
[ ]. Similarly, the International Criminal Court (ICC) found that British armed forces committed war crimes in Iraq, including willful killing, torture, and rape, yet there has been no criminal accountability for senior British officials [ ].
This pervasive lack of accountability set a dangerous precedent, contributing to the
culture of impunity that would continue to plague Iraq for years to come.
References:
[ ] https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/
coalition-invaded-iraq-impunity-reigns-supreme/
/ /iraq–years-since-the-us-led


Post-Invasion Violence and the Culture of Impunity
The US-led invasion, while ostensibly aimed at liberation, inadvertently sowed the
seeds for prolonged instability and a deeply entrenched culture of impunity. Ill
conceived policies, such as the de-Ba’athification process and the disbandment of the
Iraqi security forces, created a dangerous power vacuum. Furthermore, the influx of
vast quantities of arms into the country exacerbated an already volatile situation [ ].
These factors collectively contributed to a security vacuum that allowed sectarian
violence to spiral out of control, trapping Iraq in successive cycles of violence. The
devastating legacy of these policies continues to manifest in new victims to this day
[ ].


This environment fostered a pervasive culture of impunity, where perpetrators of
violence, whether state actors or non-state armed groups, have largely operated
without fear of accountability. This lack of justice has not only perpetuated the cycle of
violence but has also eroded public trust in institutions and the rule of law. The failure
to adequately address past abuses has created a fertile ground for new violations,
demonstrating a clear link between the initial post-invasion policies and the ongoing
human rights crisis.


References:
[ ] https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/
coalition-invaded-iraq-impunity-reigns-supreme/
/ /iraq–years-since-the-us-led
Abuses by Iraqi Government and Affiliated Militias


(Post-Uprising and Ongoing)
The period following the October popular uprising in central and southern Iraq
marked a new phase of severe human rights abuses, primarily perpetrated by state
security forces and armed groups affiliated with the state, including the Popular
Mobilization Forces (PMF). Protesters, who took to the streets demanding basic
improvements to everyday life and employment opportunities, were met with lethal
force. Human Rights Watch reported that state security forces and affiliated armed
groups opened fire on demonstrators, killing at least
protesters during the uprising


Despite promises of legal accountability by former Prime Minister Mustafa al
Kadhimi, justice for these killings, assassinations, kidnappings, and injuries has
remained largely elusive, with legal complaints rarely progressing [ ].
Extrajudicial killings continue to be a grave concern. Credible reports indicate arbitrary
or unlawful killings by government agents and unidentified gunmen. A stark example
is the alleged shooting and killing of popular TikTok gay personality and makeup artist
Noor Alsaffar in Baghdad by Iran-aligned PMF militias on September ,
[ ].

While some incremental steps have been taken to bring perpetrators to justice, such as the
life sentence issued to Lieutenant Colonel Omar Nazar for suppressing
demonstrations that led to at least deaths, these instances remain isolated against
a backdrop of widespread impunity [ ].


Enforced disappearances are another deeply troubling issue. There are numerous
reports of disappearances perpetrated by or on behalf of government authorities,
including Federal Police and PMF units. The Iraqi Observatory for Human Rights
reported nearly, missing persons reports between
and, emphasizing that the actual total number is likely much higher [ ]. Amnesty International has urged
authorities to determine the whereabouts of at least men and boys forcibly
disappeared in June by PMF units during operations to retake Fallujah from ISIS,
noting that no units have been held accountable for these disappearances [ ].

The UN Committee on Enforced Disappearances has repeatedly urged the Iraqi government to
address the needs and rights of victims and to incorporate enforced disappearances as
a separate offense in national legislation [ ].


Torture and other cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment remain prevalent in Iraqi
jails, detention facilities, and prisons. Despite constitutional prohibitions, credible
reports indicate that government officials employ these practices. The legal framework
lacks adequate safeguards to prevent torture, and courts routinely accept forced
confessions as evidence, even when obtained through torture, particularly in ISIS
related counterterrorism cases [ ].

This systemic issue undermines the integrity of the
justice system and perpetuates a cycle of abuse.
References:[ ]https://www.hrw.org/world-report/https://www.state.gov/reports/
/country-chapters/iraq
[ ]-country-reports-on-human-rights-practices/iraq/


Restrictions on Freedoms and Targeting of Critics
Beyond direct violence, both the federal Iraqi government has increasingly imposed restrictions on fundamental freedoms and civic space. This has created an environment where government critics and
human rights advocates face significant risks and legal challenges.

Individuals who seek to investigate allegations of torture or advocate for human rights
are often targeted. For instance, a legal complaint was filed against Dr. Ali al-Bayati, a
member of Iraq’s High Commission for Human Rights, simply because he sought to
investigate torture allegations—a core part of his institutional mandate [ ].

This case is indicative of a broader pattern where government critics and human rights advocates
are subjected to broadly defined defamation laws, effectively silencing dissent.
In the KRI, Kurdish authorities have utilized vaguely worded laws to target critics for
expressing opinions they object to.


Restrictions on internet freedom and freedom of assembly also contribute to the
shrinking civic space. While not explicitly detailed in the provided sources, the broader
context of targeting critics and suppressing dissent implies limitations on digital
expression and the ability to organize peaceful gatherings. The cumulative effect of
these measures is a chilling effect on free speech and a significant impediment to the
work of civil society organizations.


References:[ ]https://www.hrw.org/world-report/https://www.state.gov/reports/
/country-chapters/iraq [ ]-country-reports-on-human-rights-practices/iraq/

Vulnerability of Marginalized Groups
The human rights crisis in Iraq disproportionately affects marginalized groups, who
face systemic discrimination, violence, and a lack of protection under the law. Their
vulnerability is exacerbated by patriarchal norms, discriminatory legal frameworks,
and a pervasive culture of impunity.

Women’s Rights
Iraqi women, who played a central role in the protest movement, continue
to struggle against deeply entrenched patriarchal norms within Iraq’s legal system.
Survivors of human trafficking are often unjustly tried and convicted for prostitution,
highlighting a severe lack of protection and support. Access to shelter and justice for
women survivors of gender-based violence remains severely limited. While some
underground shelters exist, they lack widespread support and are often criticized or
attacked by authorities and families [ ].

Efforts to pass an anti-domestic violence law have stalled, partly due to the prolonged
government-formation process. Iraq’s penal code contains provisions that enable
impunity for male violence against women, including those that allow husbands to
punish their wives and parents to discipline their children. Furthermore, mitigated
sentences are granted for violent acts, including murder, committed for so-called
“honorable motives,” or if a husband catches his wife or female relative in the act of
adultery or sex outside marriage. The penal code also allows perpetrators of rape or
sexual assault to escape prosecution or have their sentences quashed if they marry
their victim [ ]. These legal loopholes perpetuate violence and deny justice to
countless women.


In a concerning development, members of the Kurdistan Regional Government
proposed a bill to the Kurdish Parliament on September, that would punish
any individual or group advocating for the rights of LGBT people with jail time and
fines [ ]. If enacted, this bill would further institutionalize discrimination and
endanger those working to protect the rights of a highly vulnerable community.


Civil Documentation
An estimated one million Iraqis lack civil documentation, nearly five years after the
government declared victory over ISIS. This absence of official documents significantly
hinders their access to basic services and rights, particularly affecting internally
displaced persons and returnee populations from ISIS-held areas. Without civil
documentation, individuals are effectively rendered invisible to the state, unable to
access healthcare, education, or legal protection, further entrenching their
marginalization.
References:[ ]https://www.hrw.org/world-report/https://www.state.gov/reports/


Conclusion
Two decades after the invasion, Iraq remains a nation grappling with a profound and pervasive human rights crisis. The initial period of occupation by US-led Coalition forces was marked by serious abuses, including indiscriminate attacks, secret detentions, enforced disappearances, and torture, for which accountability has been
largely absent. The subsequent political instability, fueled by ill-conceived post-invasion policies, created a fertile ground for ongoing violence and a deeply entrenched culture of impunity.


In recent years, the Iraqi government and its affiliated militias have continued to
perpetrate widespread human rights violations, particularly in response to popular
protests.

Extrajudicial killings, enforced disappearances, and torture remain prevalent,
often carried out with little fear of prosecution. Furthermore, the systematic targeting
of government critics, journalists, and human rights advocates, coupled with
restrictions on fundamental freedoms, has stifled dissent and eroded civic space.

Marginalized groups, including women, bear a disproportionate burden of these abuses, facing systemic discrimination, violence, and a lack of legal protection. The plight of those lacking civil documentation further
highlights the systemic failures to uphold basic human rights.


The international community and the National Council of the Iraqi Opposition must take decisive
action to address this ongoing crisis.

This includes:
Ensuring Accountability: All perpetrators of human rights violations, regardless
of their position or affiliation, must be held accountable through fair and
transparent legal processes. This requires independent investigations,
prosecutions, and appropriate penalties.


Upholding Human Rights: The Iraqi government must adhere to its
international human rights obligations, guaranteeing fundamental freedoms,
protecting marginalized groups, and ending practices such as torture, enforced
disappearances, and extrajudicial killings.


Implementing Reforms: Comprehensive legal and institutional reforms are
urgently needed to strengthen the rule of law, ensure due process, and provide
effective remedies for victims of human rights abuses.


Providing Reparation: Victims of human rights violations must be afforded full
and effective reparation, including restitution, compensation, rehabilitation,
satisfaction, and guarantees of non-repetition.


The path to a just and stable Iraq requires a fundamental shift towards respect for
human rights and the rule of law. The international community must not turn a blind
eye to the suffering of the Iraqi people, but must instead exert sustained pressure to
ensure that the next two decades are not a repeat of the abuses and impunity that
have defined the last